Al Arabiya TV, the Saudi-owned satellite TV channel, takes a look at its Qatari-owned competition, Al-Jazeera TV. It looks specifically at Al-Jazeera’s purchase of Current TV, a progressive channel co-founded by former Vice President Al Gore and wonders if this makes any sense.

The article notes that because it is state-sponsored, Al-Jazeera doesn’t have the profit-making pressures that other news channels have. Profits are one thing; political influence is another. What made the Current TV purchase attractive, the article notes, is that that channel already had distribution in the US, something that Al-Jazeera has been struggling to get. Current TV, though, was pretty much a flop. In the latest ratings, it could claim only 42K prime-time viewers, compared to millions watching CNN or FOX. What’s more, just because cable networks carried Current TV was no guarantee that they would carry its new owner, Al-Jazeera. Indeed, within hours of the purchase, Time-Warner Cable dropped Current TV from its lineup.

The article may be self-serving on the part of Al Arabiya; it is in competition with Al-Jazeera. Further, there’s always been a certain amount of friction and bickering between Saudis and Qataris on many fronts. The purchase is clearly a gamble, though. I’m sure the Saudis would like to see it fail, both to thumb their noses at Qatar and to have a competitor shoot itself in the foot.

Al Jazeera’s $500m ‘American Dream’ … a risky gamble?

Al Jazeera’s hefty investment in a flagging U.S. television network has left many stuck for the answer to a simple question: Why?

The immediate reaction of many observers who have written about this was that it goes in line with general Qatari preoccupation with “buying influence” and exposure.

As such, if a non-profit state-backed organization such as Qatar Foundation was happy to throw away 150 million Euros to sponsor a Spanish soccer team (Barcelona FC) back in 2010 (with no real benefit from the exposure for the non-profit organization); it was certainly not a surprise to many when the Qatari state-funded broadcaster said earlier this month that it would buy Current TV, which was cofounded by former American vice-president Al Gore in 2005, for a whopping $500 million.

That price tag left many commentators aghast, not least because the left-leaning U.S. network had for some time struggled with low ratings, boasting a prime-time audience of just 42,000 in the fourth quarter of 2012.

January:19:2013 - 09:02 | Comments & Trackbacks (5) | Permalink
5 Responses to “Checking Out the Competition”
  1. 1
    Jerry M Said:
    January:19:2013 - 15:56 

    I would love to know what kind of agreements Current has with cable and satellite providers as to who carries it if ownership and/or programming changes. I assume Al Jazeera has hired competent attorneys before signing on the bottom line.

    I cannot imagine this network doing very well in the US. It is too bad they could not find networks willing to carry them. I would certainly have given them a look. In the current enviroment I assume they will bleed money.

  2. 2
    John Burgess Said:
    January:19:2013 - 18:21 

    @Jerry M: Al-Jazeera a a very good web presence, including a channel on YouTube that is constantly being updated. The article has an analyst wondering why they’re spending so much money to compete against themselves.

  3. 3
    Chris Said:
    January:20:2013 - 09:18 

    Buying influence.
    Al Gore and his friends poured a lot of their own money into Current TV and now want out because they produced programs that no one wanted to watch. Al Gore and his friends get a nice profit, Qatar buys new democrat friends on the hill.
    They hosted the climate summit for similar reasons.

  4. 4
    Jerry M Said:
    January:21:2013 - 13:28 


    I certainly think the Current TV story is scandalous. Gore and his friends’ network was only carried because they had influence in Washington. Now they are getting richer courtesy of a foreign potentate.

    Gore has often been a bit holier than though so perhaps it is fun to see him as a simple self-promoter.

  5. 5
    Chris Said:
    January:26:2013 - 03:09 

    @Jerry M

    I don’t see Gore as a simple self-promoter, he isn’t simple.

    I see him as a politician who has found a nice way to make lots of money off the tax payers whist projecting an image of being selfless. Rather like some TV evangelists.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

antalya escortizmir escort
  • Advertising Info

    Interested in sponsoring Crossroads Arabia? Contact me for more information.

  • Copyright Notice

    All original materials copyright, 2004-2014. Other materials copyrighted by their respective owners.

    The fact that this blog permits one to use RSS to read content does not constitute permission to republish content. All requests for republication must be submitted through the Contact form on the menu above. Violations of copyright will be dealt with through applicable law.