Writing in Arab News, Abdulateef Al-Mulhim wonders why the Kurds, with a population that numbers in the tens of millions, are largely invisible. They’re not entirely invisible. Jebel Akrad, Mountain of the Kurds, is one of Damascus’ backdrops. The Ayyubid Dynasty – established by Saladin (Salahiddin), his brothers, and their descendants – is still taught in schools.

For an ancient people, though, they are rather unique in not having their own state. Despite some efforts, primarily after WWI, Kurdistan never happened. Instead, with the exception of the well-organized Kurdish area of post-Gulf War Iraq, Kurds remain minorities in Syria, Turkey, and Iran.

Kurds, a proud people without a nation
ABDULATEEF AL-MULHIM

No one wants them to be in their territory, yet no one wants to give them their own territory

The Kurdish people have enjoyed the highest form of freedom for thousands of years. They mainly lived in northern Syria, east of Turkey, west of Iran and north of Iraq. They enjoyed the ability to move from place to another without any restrictions. They were one people, one language and one form of life. The number of Kurds all over the world is over 30 million. But, they don’t have a nation. Before World War I, they didn’t need one. They were free to wander around. They are Muslims. But not Arabs. And it should have made no difference. Islam has no nationality. But, the Kurdish people are different. No one wants them to be in their territory, yet no one wants to give them their own territory.

With my humble knowledge, I will only talk about the Kurds in Turkey, Iraq, Syria and Iran; not the Kurds scattered all over the world. Books will be needed if you write about the Kurds. They were subjected to relocations and they were considered a lower class in all the nations they lived in. The Turkish territories are the most beautiful part of these countries. After the World War I and the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, new nations were created. No one single piece of territory was given to the Kurdish people. And the Kurds couldn’t move through the borders of these new nations. And even though the 1920 Treaty of Sevres was intended to introduce new states including one for the Kurds, it never saw the light. And after the takeover of Turkey by Kamal Attaturk, the Kurds were not even allowed to speak their language. It was a crime to say the words Kurd or Kurdish. And it wasn’t until the 1990s when the Turkish people heard the word Kurds.


November:29:2011 - 06:06 | Comments & Trackbacks (7) | Permalink
7 Responses to “The Invisible Kurds”
  1. 1
    Michel Said:
    November:29:2011 - 11:12 

    Kurds ar Muslims, the author says; is that sure ? I personally met Christian Kurds in Iraq.

  2. 2
    John Burgess Said:
    November:29:2011 - 11:45 

    Kurds are mostly Sunni Muslims. There are Shi’ite Kurds as well as Christian and Jewish Kurds. There are also several religious groups (e.g., Yazidis) which mainstream Muslim groups are reluctant to call ‘Muslim’.

  3. 3
    Solomon2 Said:
    November:29:2011 - 13:07 

    Abdulateef Al-Mulhim is the only Arab commentator I have read who openly cites the Treaty of Sevres. It was via this treaty that the Ottoman Caliph supported the establishment of Palestine as a Jewish homeland without prejudicing the civil and religious rights of Jews elsewhere.

  4. 4
    Susanne Said:
    November:30:2011 - 07:01 

    I enjoyed the article. It’s sad how the Kurds have been mistreated.

  5. 5
    John Burgess Said:
    November:30:2011 - 08:18 

    @Susanne: Unfortunately, the Kurds deserve a large share of the blame themselves. Power struggles within the Kurdish communities have made it difficult to form a state, even within one country. The Kurdish areas of Iraq are showing that Kurds can self-rule, but even there, it’s taken time to resolve tribal and familial conflicts. Do read the Wikipedia entry on the Ayyubid Dynasty. It was one of the briefer dynasties because brothers and cousins, uncles and nephews could not work together.

  6. 6
    Ethos Said:
    November:30:2011 - 23:23 

    Imagine if Kashmiris or Palestinians were spread over 4 different countries. Essentially, since the Kurdish populations are scattered over Turkey, Iraq, Iran and Syria, giving them statehood requires all 4 countries to give up land. Not going to happen.

  7. 7
    Niels Christensen Said:
    December:01:2011 - 14:45 

    Interesting article. But sometimes it seems that there is no love lost between arab sunni and kurdish sunni. One of thing in the discussions of the invasion in Iraq that thought me a lot about muslim and ethnicity was the fact, that no one never mentioned how the invasion was a big advantage to the kurds. Well the kurds aren’t arabs, they don’t count.

    @Ethos
    In fact there is a lot of palestinians living in Jordan ( not counting fugitives) 1.5 million at least. Bua as you can guess, the beduins of Jordan doesn’t like the palestinians.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

spacer
travestiler istanbul escort bayanistanbul escortAntalya Escort BayanAntalya Escortapartment for sale in istanbulBeylikdüzü Escort BayanBeylikdüzü Escort anaokul | travestiAntalya Escort BayanAntalya Escortizmir escortizmir escort bayanwhois
  • Advertising Info

    Interested in advertising on or sponsoring Crossroads Arabia? Contact me for more information.

  • Copyright Notice

    All original materials copyright, 2004-2013. Other materials copyrighted by their respective owners.

    The fact that this blog permits one to use RSS to read content does not constitute permission to republish content. All requests for republication must be submitted through the Contact form on the menu above. Violations of copyright will be dealt with through applicable law.