Here’s an interesting piece in Asharq Alawsat from Diana Mukkaled on the current disruptions occurring at Islam on Line, an ostensibly moderate Islamic website. Sorting out the problems is taking place behind closed doors, she says, as various groups try to define Islam, moderation, extremism, and jihad. She argues that these are extremely important questions, so important that they need to be argued and answered in public, with full transparency.
IslamOnline: What Moderation
Diana MukkaledThe future of the IslamOnline website [IOL] remains unclear. The assurances made by the website’s administration, as well as those by its spiritual guide, Sheikh Yusuf al Qaradawi, have failed to dispel the ambiguities that have arisen as a result of the latest crisis. The IOL staff staged a sit-in at the IOL offices in Egypt in protest against unfair managerial decisions that they described as unjust. This protest was aimed at the al-Balagh Cultural Society, which is the Qatar-based financial sponsor of IOL.
Analysis on the background and causes behind the crisis at the world’s most popular Islamic website vary. Some believe that behind the crisis is an Egyptian-Qatari dispute over the management of the website. While others believe the crisis is due to the disturbance over the site taking a more hard-line and conservative approach. A third group even believes that this may have something to do with the Muslim Brotherhood, and that the US has played an undisclosed role in this crisis.
Whatever the case may be, this is a crisis that raises a question that relates to all aspects of Islam in the post-9/11 era; what kind of media for what kind of Islam after more than a decade of crises where politicians, philosophers, and activists have explored and analyzed everything connected to Islam to the point that the media is leaning towards irrational fear rather than towards research and knowledge?
It goes without saying that we live in a world that has grown more obsessed about religion and its interconnection with politics. Perhaps Islam, following the spread of armed Jihadist groups, has become the chief but not the sole subject of such controversy. Religion has become a global obsession as religious groups and sects have started to bring all their concerns to the internet. The internet, which is the most important invention in modern times, has allowed for the revival of religion. Religion is no longer about outdated ceremonies and tales that have no connection to their surroundings. The internet has increased the opportunity for there to be meetings and dialogue between groups, which we never imagined before and the internet has also contributed to the isolation of groups and trends that have become overly focused and centred on their websites.
…
for What Kind of Islam”
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
March:27:2010 - 10:58
[...] What Kind of Mediafor What Kind of Islam | Crossroads Arabia [...]
March:27:2010 - 17:23
[...] What Kind of Mediafor What Kind of Islam | Crossroads Arabia [...]
March:28:2010 - 12:21
The trend toward fundamentalism in all religions pre-dated 9/11 and seemed like more of a backlash to the more liberal times of the 60′s and 70′s and the hedonism of the 80′s.
The internet could just as well be used to be spreading more anti-religious sentiment as the pro-religious sentiment described.
That said, I agree with Mukkaled that there is also a danger on the internet of becoming isolated within a group think, and drawing from around the world a very small group in terms of actual percentages who believe whatever.
Also the relative lack of filter or context on the internet lets surfers land in places they don’t realize are extreme.
I once googled creative writing in Hong Kong and came up with ONLY creative writing activities of the Henry Miller type. Of course that is far from representative and I realized it must be, but was hard pressed to find the right combo of key words to pull up anything else.