“Harper’s Magazine,” a very liberal monthly, has this piece offering another perspective—similar to mine—about the way many used Chas Freeman’s relationship with the Middle East Policy Council, which receives some of its funding from Saudi Arabia—to derail his appointment as Director of the National Intelligence Council…

Chas Freeman and Saudi Money
Ken Silverstein

One of the most common charges hurled by the opponents of Charles Freeman Jr., who yesterday withdrew as chair of the Obama administration’s National Intelligence Council, was that he “headed a Saudi-funded Middle East advocacy group in Washington.” I’ve written about the influence of money on think tanks and think it’s a valid point of concern, but let’s put this assertion in perspective.

Freeman headed the Middle East Policy Council. I’m not sure how much Saudi money flows to the think tank, but it can’t be much. I checked the firm’s non-profit disclosure form for 2007 and its total receipts for the year were $731,000, and it had assets of $1.3 million. Freeman was paid $87,000 that year.

Compare that to the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, a conservative think tank that is overwhelmingly supportive of Israel and whose board includes Henry Kissinger, Alexander Haig and Martin Peretz. Its receipts for 2007 came to $11.9 million, and it had $26.5 million in assets. Robert Satloff, the institute’s executive director, was paid $307,000. Dennis Ross, now the Obama administration’s special adviser on Iran, was paid $208,000 for duties as a “Distinguished Fellow.”

UPDATE: Here’s a column from Abdul Rahman Al-Rashed in the March 17 issue of Asharq Alawsat. He takes a far harsher line on the subject of the ‘Israeli Lobby’ than I would, giving it far more power than it has. Freeman brought down lightning from every group and individual who has strong feelings about Israel—and China, for that matter. I simply do not see the organized effort that could realistically be laid at the feet of any ‘lobby’. Rather, Freeman had too many enemies on too many fronts and too few friends to support him.

Freeman and the Defamation of the Zionist Lobby

March:16:2009 - 09:21 | Comments & Trackbacks (1) | Permalink
One Response to “More on Chas Freeman and ‘Saudi Money’”
  1. 1
    Solomon2 Said:
    March:17:2009 - 12:34 

    The more carefully I read the Opinion pieces in Asharq Alawsat the more convinced I become that the anti-Zionist stuff is obligatory – in some columns it clearly looks like a cut-and-paste job. Abdul Rahman Al-Rashed is a clear exception. I presume that senior editors like him are responsible for forcing their juniors to write such opinions that so often jar with the main thrust of their writing.

    Abdul Rahman Al-Rashed celebrates because Freeman blamed “the Zionist lobby” as a whole rather than himself, apparently on the grounds that it highlights “the extortion of American politicians”. Yet Mr. Freeman’s withdrawal had, in my opinion, the effect of claiming a fact but denying himself the opportunity to prove it – and for others to disprove it.

    The few beneficiaries of Freeman’s actions will be men like Al-Rashed who use them to reinforce what I consider a distorted world-view (“all who express opinion against Israel are enemies of Israel, which in turn is considered a greater sin than disagreeing or even being enemies of the USA”) which will only increase misunderstandings between the U.S. and the Arab World. Arabs who believe in the stuff Al-Rashed writes will never have room in their minds to consider that other motivations may be much more important in determining U.S. actions.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

antalya escortizmir escort
  • Advertising Info

    Interested in sponsoring Crossroads Arabia? Contact me for more information.

  • Copyright Notice

    All original materials copyright, 2004-2014. Other materials copyrighted by their respective owners.

    The fact that this blog permits one to use RSS to read content does not constitute permission to republish content. All requests for republication must be submitted through the Contact form on the menu above. Violations of copyright will be dealt with through applicable law.