<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Encouraging (Some) Media to Speak Out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrdarabia.org/2008/12/13/encouraging-some-media-to-speak-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrdarabia.org/2008/12/13/encouraging-some-media-to-speak-out/</link>
	<description>Informed comment and commentary about Saudi Arabia, reform, and its relations with the US</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:26:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Burgess</title>
		<link>http://xrdarabia.org/2008/12/13/encouraging-some-media-to-speak-out/comment-page-1/#comment-17464</link>
		<dc:creator>John Burgess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrdarabia.org/?p=6248#comment-17464</guid>
		<description>Aafke has it right. While there&#039;s no piece of paper telling journalists to not write on the subject, apparently word got out that the papers should let this particular issue cool for a while. During that time, however, there were several news pieces about Saudi women&#039;s triumphs and tragedies behind the wheel, just no op-eds calling for it or columns discussing it.

Newspapers in neighboring states, however, had a sudden flourishing of those columns!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aafke has it right. While there&#8217;s no piece of paper telling journalists to not write on the subject, apparently word got out that the papers should let this particular issue cool for a while. During that time, however, there were several news pieces about Saudi women&#8217;s triumphs and tragedies behind the wheel, just no op-eds calling for it or columns discussing it.</p>
<p>Newspapers in neighboring states, however, had a sudden flourishing of those columns!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aafke</title>
		<link>http://xrdarabia.org/2008/12/13/encouraging-some-media-to-speak-out/comment-page-1/#comment-17459</link>
		<dc:creator>Aafke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrdarabia.org/?p=6248#comment-17459</guid>
		<description>Yes, apparently journalists are not to put in articles on women driving. There was a link a while back, on Saudi Jeans to an article which a paper refused to publish, and which was published on the internet instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, apparently journalists are not to put in articles on women driving. There was a link a while back, on Saudi Jeans to an article which a paper refused to publish, and which was published on the internet instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi</title>
		<link>http://xrdarabia.org/2008/12/13/encouraging-some-media-to-speak-out/comment-page-1/#comment-17455</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrdarabia.org/?p=6248#comment-17455</guid>
		<description>Was there a moratorium on articles about women driving? WhY and when? Is that an official thing or self censorship again?
Does anyone know what&#039;s happening with this whole issue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was there a moratorium on articles about women driving? WhY and when? Is that an official thing or self censorship again?<br />
Does anyone know what&#8217;s happening with this whole issue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Burgess</title>
		<link>http://xrdarabia.org/2008/12/13/encouraging-some-media-to-speak-out/comment-page-1/#comment-17434</link>
		<dc:creator>John Burgess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 22:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrdarabia.org/?p=6248#comment-17434</guid>
		<description>Well, I haven&#039;t seen any articles on it of late...

Maybe women are already driving and they just forgot to report it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I haven&#8217;t seen any articles on it of late&#8230;</p>
<p>Maybe women are already driving and they just forgot to report it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aafke</title>
		<link>http://xrdarabia.org/2008/12/13/encouraging-some-media-to-speak-out/comment-page-1/#comment-17431</link>
		<dc:creator>Aafke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 20:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrdarabia.org/?p=6248#comment-17431</guid>
		<description>John is all for freedom of speach! :)

What about the moratorium on articles about &#039;&#039;women driving&#039;&#039;? Is that lifted now in this all out festival of free-journalism?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John is all for freedom of speach! <img src='http://xrdarabia.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>What about the moratorium on articles about &#8221;women driving&#8221;? Is that lifted now in this all out festival of free-journalism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sparky</title>
		<link>http://xrdarabia.org/2008/12/13/encouraging-some-media-to-speak-out/comment-page-1/#comment-17430</link>
		<dc:creator>Sparky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrdarabia.org/?p=6248#comment-17430</guid>
		<description>&quot;Forum on freedom of press gets off to censored start&quot;

Let me humbly quote Thomas Jefferson

&quot;I have sworn upon the alter of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man&quot;

- Thomas Jefferson

&quot;Of all the forms of tyranny
over the mind of man,
none is more terrible than fear --
to be afraid
of being one&#039;s self
among one&#039;s neighbors.&quot;

-Paul B. Hoffman



And as long as John will tolerate it on his blog :-) Thank you John for letting me express myself...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Forum on freedom of press gets off to censored start&#8221;</p>
<p>Let me humbly quote Thomas Jefferson</p>
<p>&#8220;I have sworn upon the alter of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man&#8221;</p>
<p>- Thomas Jefferson</p>
<p>&#8220;Of all the forms of tyranny<br />
over the mind of man,<br />
none is more terrible than fear &#8211;<br />
to be afraid<br />
of being one&#8217;s self<br />
among one&#8217;s neighbors.&#8221;</p>
<p>-Paul B. Hoffman</p>
<p>And as long as John will tolerate it on his blog <img src='http://xrdarabia.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Thank you John for letting me express myself&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sparky</title>
		<link>http://xrdarabia.org/2008/12/13/encouraging-some-media-to-speak-out/comment-page-1/#comment-17427</link>
		<dc:creator>Sparky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 18:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrdarabia.org/?p=6248#comment-17427</guid>
		<description>I give the Saudis much props and credit to a seamless Hajj but I disagree or would object to that necessarily being primarily motivated by pious and righteousness inclinations. But only God knows the intentions of individuals at the end of the day...

There is just so much more issues that need progress that are moving at snail speed that OUTRAGE ME!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I give the Saudis much props and credit to a seamless Hajj but I disagree or would object to that necessarily being primarily motivated by pious and righteousness inclinations. But only God knows the intentions of individuals at the end of the day&#8230;</p>
<p>There is just so much more issues that need progress that are moving at snail speed that OUTRAGE ME!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sparky</title>
		<link>http://xrdarabia.org/2008/12/13/encouraging-some-media-to-speak-out/comment-page-1/#comment-17426</link>
		<dc:creator>Sparky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 18:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrdarabia.org/?p=6248#comment-17426</guid>
		<description>Let me clarify what I mean in the above post timed 11:28 because it may be subject to various intrepretations: Here goes:

What I mean is that it is all talk (aka. black propaganda)that is all I ever see and no action (aka. in terms of progress of women&#039;s rights for example which is an important and relevant subject to me).

Because I see no progress in regards to actions in regards to human rights especially those regarding women they are only empty words and promises (aka. in terms of talking about how great Islam is which I do not argue but I argue against ideology versus current practice). 

Thus by showing the true image of Islam in coerced words does nothing or carries no meaning to me personally and serves as but a meaningless form of expression (aka. toilet paper) absent of actions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me clarify what I mean in the above post timed 11:28 because it may be subject to various intrepretations: Here goes:</p>
<p>What I mean is that it is all talk (aka. black propaganda)that is all I ever see and no action (aka. in terms of progress of women&#8217;s rights for example which is an important and relevant subject to me).</p>
<p>Because I see no progress in regards to actions in regards to human rights especially those regarding women they are only empty words and promises (aka. in terms of talking about how great Islam is which I do not argue but I argue against ideology versus current practice). </p>
<p>Thus by showing the true image of Islam in coerced words does nothing or carries no meaning to me personally and serves as but a meaningless form of expression (aka. toilet paper) absent of actions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Burgess</title>
		<link>http://xrdarabia.org/2008/12/13/encouraging-some-media-to-speak-out/comment-page-1/#comment-17422</link>
		<dc:creator>John Burgess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 17:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrdarabia.org/?p=6248#comment-17422</guid>
		<description>Yes, a seamless Haj is to be expected. But it is not something that happens automatically. With 3.5 million people coming to one place, at one time, to do exactly the same things--and to have them do it without chaos and catastrophe--is worth a certain amount of self-congratulation. Supporting the Haj takes time, money, and interest, so I think a certain amount of praise is due. 

I think any major US city would have trouble coping with what is, in essence, 60 Super Bowls going on at the same time, for five days straight.

I don&#039;t see anything wrong with projecting an ideal while knowing full well that the reality falls short of that ideal. I don&#039;t find that hypocritical at all. And Haj is perhaps the time the Saudis--at least those in Mecca--demonstrate and act upon religious tolerance. Sufis and Shi&#039;ites are welcome to Haj and do the rituals in their own way. Things get a little sketchier post-Haj, in Medina, but that &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; post-Haj.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, a seamless Haj is to be expected. But it is not something that happens automatically. With 3.5 million people coming to one place, at one time, to do exactly the same things&#8211;and to have them do it without chaos and catastrophe&#8211;is worth a certain amount of self-congratulation. Supporting the Haj takes time, money, and interest, so I think a certain amount of praise is due. </p>
<p>I think any major US city would have trouble coping with what is, in essence, 60 Super Bowls going on at the same time, for five days straight.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see anything wrong with projecting an ideal while knowing full well that the reality falls short of that ideal. I don&#8217;t find that hypocritical at all. And Haj is perhaps the time the Saudis&#8211;at least those in Mecca&#8211;demonstrate and act upon religious tolerance. Sufis and Shi&#8217;ites are welcome to Haj and do the rituals in their own way. Things get a little sketchier post-Haj, in Medina, but that <em>is</em> post-Haj.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://xrdarabia.org/2008/12/13/encouraging-some-media-to-speak-out/comment-page-1/#comment-17419</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrdarabia.org/?p=6248#comment-17419</guid>
		<description>The King&#039;s vision for society is noble.

The challenge is that the ulemaa will never agree to it.

For example, while it is fine to say that Muslims should speak about the real face of Islam, that is contradicted by the fact that only one very narrow version of Islam (that of the ulemaa) is permitted.

What would happen were a journalist to publish articles on the traditions, philosophy, and ideas of the Sufi, Shi&#039;a, or Ahmadiyya community?

The answer is clear -- the articles would be proscribed by the ulemaa.

So, while it is right to say that religious perspectives should be freely available regarding Islam, it should include all the paths chosen by those who believe that they follow religion, and certainly all paths chosen by those who believe that they follow the ways of the Rasulullah.

That must include those whom we commonly deride as apostates or non-believers.

There should be no compulsion in matters of religion, the Quran states.

It is regrettable that this precept is always forgotten by the ulemaa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The King&#8217;s vision for society is noble.</p>
<p>The challenge is that the ulemaa will never agree to it.</p>
<p>For example, while it is fine to say that Muslims should speak about the real face of Islam, that is contradicted by the fact that only one very narrow version of Islam (that of the ulemaa) is permitted.</p>
<p>What would happen were a journalist to publish articles on the traditions, philosophy, and ideas of the Sufi, Shi&#8217;a, or Ahmadiyya community?</p>
<p>The answer is clear &#8212; the articles would be proscribed by the ulemaa.</p>
<p>So, while it is right to say that religious perspectives should be freely available regarding Islam, it should include all the paths chosen by those who believe that they follow religion, and certainly all paths chosen by those who believe that they follow the ways of the Rasulullah.</p>
<p>That must include those whom we commonly deride as apostates or non-believers.</p>
<p>There should be no compulsion in matters of religion, the Quran states.</p>
<p>It is regrettable that this precept is always forgotten by the ulemaa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

