<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Saudi Debate over Freedom of Expression</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrdarabia.org/2008/11/12/the-saudi-debate-over-freedom-of-expression/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrdarabia.org/2008/11/12/the-saudi-debate-over-freedom-of-expression/</link>
	<description>Informed comment and commentary about Saudi Arabia, reform, and its relations with the US</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:26:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Burgess</title>
		<link>http://xrdarabia.org/2008/11/12/the-saudi-debate-over-freedom-of-expression/comment-page-1/#comment-16864</link>
		<dc:creator>John Burgess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 05:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrdarabia.org/?p=5964#comment-16864</guid>
		<description>They have a bit more weight than op-eds, I think, but maybe not a whole lot more. Clerics have a following, but they also have opposition. Those inclined to follow the cleric are likely to put more weight in his declaration of legal or not legal. 

For some clerics, it is indeed posturing, looking to buff their reputations and perhaps find a way to capitalize on it. For some, it might be a TV or radio program; for others, it might be getting in with the government sponsored ulema.

But I think most of these fatwas are coming from clerics who strongly believe what they are saying... they&#039;re not posturing. Many Saudis think the country is going to hell in a handbasket because of moral laxity, inattention to religious requirements, getting too cozy with non-Muslms, and the like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have a bit more weight than op-eds, I think, but maybe not a whole lot more. Clerics have a following, but they also have opposition. Those inclined to follow the cleric are likely to put more weight in his declaration of legal or not legal. </p>
<p>For some clerics, it is indeed posturing, looking to buff their reputations and perhaps find a way to capitalize on it. For some, it might be a TV or radio program; for others, it might be getting in with the government sponsored ulema.</p>
<p>But I think most of these fatwas are coming from clerics who strongly believe what they are saying&#8230; they&#8217;re not posturing. Many Saudis think the country is going to hell in a handbasket because of moral laxity, inattention to religious requirements, getting too cozy with non-Muslms, and the like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Gonyea</title>
		<link>http://xrdarabia.org/2008/11/12/the-saudi-debate-over-freedom-of-expression/comment-page-1/#comment-16863</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gonyea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 02:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrdarabia.org/?p=5964#comment-16863</guid>
		<description>It seems to me fatwas are thrown around in S.A. like op-eds are in Western media. Do people act on them or are they nothing more than posturing [public relations and/or propaganda]?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me fatwas are thrown around in S.A. like op-eds are in Western media. Do people act on them or are they nothing more than posturing [public relations and/or propaganda]?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

